Personality testing has a surprisingly long history. It first began in World War I as a selection tool for “shell shock” (now PTSD) vulnerability in soldiers, with Robert Woodworth developing an early test, the “Personal Data Sheet,” to assess for potential psychological breakdowns in recruits. Next, early in the 20th century, the theory of Carl Jung, the founder of analytical psychology, inspired Katharine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers to develop the MBTI during World War II for job recruitment purposes. Fast-forward to the 1980s, and the Big Five (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism) emerged as a more scientifically robust framework.
Today, personality tests like the MBTI and Enneagram have taken over workspaces, dating profiles, and trending TikTok videos. But with such tools claiming to expose our quirks, can we trust them? Be cautious, according to science most have not withstood rigorous testing, rely on self-reporting, and can trap us in labels.
Let’s see why taking your MBTI result at face value can become a prescription for disorientation in life.
New to MBTI community? Let me explain MBTI in 2 minutes. Watch here
Why Your Personality Test Can Lie to You
The Oversimplification Pit
Personality tests love tidy little boxes. The MBTI, for instance, simplifies 8 billion humans down to 16 types. But human personalities are complex, contextual, and full of contradictions. Are you an extrovert in all the settings, or only in the presence of your favourite people? The either/or labelling style of MBTI has no basis in reality e.g., you are “either” a thinker “or” a feeler. In contrast with dimensional frameworks such as the Big 5, it’s cool to discover that you’re an INTJ or an ENFP, but personality tests simplify our rich selves. One person can have parts of many personality types, depending on the situation.
The Validity Gap
Despite their popularity, many personality tests are not backed by solid science. Take the MBTI, for instance. Critics argue that it lacks reliability and validity. Not all tests are created equal. While the Big 5 has peer-reviewed backing, the reliability of MBTI is shaky—50% of test-takers get a different result after retaking it. Many online personality quizzes are worse, designed by algorithms craving clicks, not clarity. So, always take tests like MBTI or BigFive with a grain of salt.
The Problem of Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Picture this: getting a personality test and finding out that you’re an introvert. Next, you start to avoid social events, assuming social life isn’t for you, and in a self-verifying way, your behavior reflects your label, proving your suspicions correct. Instead of creating growth, personality tests can lock us into rigid labels. Research shows behavior unconsciously conforms to test output, hindering self-development. Imagine avoiding a leadership role simply because a quiz told you that you’re an “ISFP.” Yikes.
(Ever Wondered what could be the MBTI of Elon Musk? Any guess? Well, I guess he is XNTX. Check out my MBTI analysis here: Elon Musk MBTI Personality Type | The Ambitious Entrepreneur)
The Science Behind the Illusion of Accuracy
The Barnum Effect: How Vague Statements Can Sound Precise
The Barnum effect is a cognitive bias explaining why the feedback of personality tests will sound astonishingly accurate. This phenomenon occurs when people believe that vague, general statements about their personality are highly relatable to them because people often rate generic feedback as highly specific to them. Horoscope, personality tests etc are all common examples of the barnum effect.
The Confirmation Bias: Seeking Information That Confirms Our Existing Beliefs
We’re suckers for affirmation. If your 16 Personality Types Test tells you that you’re “creative,” then you’ll suddenly start doodle work on anything you find and forget about your other skills. According to confirmation bias, we’re inclined towards information confirming our present thinking and ignoring information that doesn’t. So, assuming that you believe that you’re a certain kind, then obviously, you’ll notice behavior that adheres to your kind and not care about behavior that doesn’t, confirming your trust in the accuracy of the test even further.
The Suggestion Effect: How Beliefs dictate your behavior
The power of suggestion comes into play when personality tests have an impact on us. For instance, when a test tells you that you’re a born leader, you will start assuming leadership roles, confirming the tendency pointed by personality tests. On one level, it can have a positive impact, but at times, it can hinder your development in terms of discovering other aspects of your personality.
(Wondering if MBTI is accurate or not? And How It Invaded Popular Culture and become a social media trend? Check out latest blog “Is MBTI Accurate? How MBTI Outpaced Its Scientific Rivals and Took Over Social Media”)
The Darker Sides of the Labeling
Stereotypes in Disguise
Personality tests can become stereotype-promoting tools. Put yourself in a place of a recruiter, for example, and imagine him choosing “forceful ESTJs” for some job role and ruling out “emotionally rich INFPs.” That sort of overreaching disregards talent and encourages bias, alarming the misuse of personality tests.
The Cures for False Certainty
Humans crave a desire for certainty, but personality tests deliver pseudo-clarity. Believing that one “is not a math person” when labelled low in Openness according to the Big 5 could potentially lead one to feel discouraged in maths and limiting one’s potential. As comforting as it’s to believe in a personality test to reveal our true selves, such a state of knowing is misguided. Human personality is in a constant state of flux and is determined by many factors including experiences and environment and overreliance on such tests could limit one’s growth.
Over-identification with testing prohibits adaptability and change.
Personality tests are like potato chips—addictive, tasty, but unhealthy. While the MBTI and Big 5 can be entertaining and offer intriguing insights into our behaviors and preferences, it’s essential to approach them with skepticism. Use them as conversation starters, not life sentences. After all, you’re not a four-letter code.
Stats for Data Geeks:
| Global annual revenue of personality testing industry | Over $2 billion |
| Percentage of Fortune 500 companies using MBTI | Approximately 80% |
| Number of MBTI tests administered annually | Over 2 million |
| Year the Big 5 model was developed | 1980s |
| Estimated accuracy rate claimed by popular tests | Up to 85% |
Follow our Facebook page for cool memes and some geeky stuff on human personality!
